beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.09.04 2014구합10042

강제퇴거명령취소

Text

In the lawsuit of this case, the part concerning the revocation of status of stay and the revocation of protection order shall be dismissed.

The defendant on October 11, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s stay in the Republic of Korea and his/her work place in Vietnam are those who were employed as seafarers (E-10) under Article 10(1) of the former Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 12421, Mar. 18, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply) and Article 12 of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (E-10) and entered the Republic of Korea on June 11, 2013 and entered into an employment contract with the employer, and enter into the employment contract with the employer on June 11, 2013.

B. The Plaintiff, while working at the above workplace, requested the employer to change the place of business on August 201, 201, on the ground of the assault, etc. of the crew members at the early police station, but the employer did not accept the request. However, the employer refused to work on August 29, 2013, and left the place of business on August 31, 2013.

On September 2, 2013, the employer reported the occurrence of the cause of the change of employment to the Defendant on August 31, 2013, because the Plaintiff left the workplace without permission, and reported the occurrence of the cause of the change of employment to the Defendant due to the unknown whereabouts.

According to the above report, on September 16, 2013, the Defendant made a service by publication (hereinafter referred to as “instant service by publication”) with respect to the following public notices (hereinafter referred to as “instant public notices”) as a public notice C:

[Public Notice] A foreigner falling under the grounds of Article 89 (Revocation and Revision of Various Permissions, etc.) of the Immigration Control Act shall possess identification cards and explanatory materials with the National Immigration Control Office no later than 10:00 on September 30, 2013 and be present at the National Immigration Control Office. If a foreigner does not attend within the above period, public notice will be made pursuant to Article 89 of the Immigration Control Act, such as cancellation of permission to stay, etc.

No. 2 Vietnam A D U.S. Place of Residence in the annual nationality name and date of birth

C. On November 11, 2013, the Defendant issued a deportation order to the Plaintiff and the Defendant issued a deportation order to the Plaintiff who visited the female Immigration Office on the basis of Articles 46 subparag. 8 and 17(1) of the former Immigration Control Act.