폭행
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On September 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 14:50 on September 14, 2012, the Defendant: (b) around 14:30 on September 10, 201, the Defendant provided a common bath for the victim C (the age of 69) who demanded the Defendant’s will to engage in the Defendant’s speech within the subway station; and (c) assaulted the victim’s chest with both hand.
2. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that the defendant and his defense counsel spreaded the defendant's arms, and they did not contain any information about the victim's chest, and they are legitimate acts or self-defense.
3. In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts can be recognized. A.
At around 14:30 on September 10, 2012, the Defendant and the victim were on board the ship at the front line of Busan subway 3.0 on September 14, 2012.
B. The victim was under the influence of getting on and off the foregoing electric vehicle.
C. The Defendant reported his face on the front door of the front door where the victim was seated by the victim, but the victim mispercing that she was her face, and the Defendant said that she was her face “hicked,” and said that she was her face at the victim’s side, not on the part of the victim, but on the part of the victim, the Defendant said that she was her face at the victim’s side. However, the victim said that her “hick, where she was frighted, her face.”
(A) The victim asserts that the defendant first made the statement that he would be able to say, but the victim would be friendly face to the victim's side rather than the victim. If the defendant first said that the victim's "drawing" is "drawing," the victim's argument cannot be accepted, since there is no logical ground that the defendant would make the victim's face to the victim's side.
2.2.3