A. The facts of recognition 1) The Defendant is a juristic person operating an filial health care hospital at the prime city in the prime city. The Plaintiff was hospitalized in the filial health care hospital from November 9, 2013 to April 26, 2014. 2) The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as a flaging the right-hand side of the shower before the shower room in the shower room at around 00:30 on April 26, 2014.

3) Although the Defendant, who operates a convalescent hospital, has a duty to take measures to prevent a shower room from being exposed to the hospital, and to prevent any person hospitalized in the hospital from getting out of the hospital, in violation of such duty, and thereby the Plaintiff did not take any particular measures to prevent a shower room, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s injury. 4) Accordingly, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in a convalescent hospital from May 29, 2014 to December 20 of the same year after being performed a shower room at the hospital located in the Republic of Korea on May 8, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 4, 5, 8, and 10, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. 1) According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is responsible for compensating for the damages suffered by the defendant due to the accident of this case. 2) The defendant asserts that the accident of this case does not occur in itself, and the injury suffered by the plaintiff is not caused by the accident of this case, and that the defendant took measures to prevent the Warsaws in the filial duty hospital prior to the accident of this case.

In full view of the purport of the arguments and arguments, the statement No. 2-1 of the evidence No. 2-1, and the fact-finding with respect to the head of the original family school of this court, the Plaintiff was not an employee of the Defendant, and the Plaintiff’s statement.