beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2012.02.09 2011누24905

요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows in front of the "Stop" of the 6th judgment of the court of first instance. "Additional medical care under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act is not different from the first medical care except for the medical care conducted after the completion of the medical care or after the completion of the medical care. Thus, the requirements for additional medical care are not different from the first medical care. Thus, in addition to the requirements for additional medical care, there is a proximate causal relation between the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the disease at the time of the initial medical treatment or the injury and disease at the time of the payment of the additional medical care, and the treatment effect can be expected by adding the additional medical care (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Du5050, Apr. 26, 2002).

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.