A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

No. 1, No. 2 of this title.

Defendant

A is the owner of "D Gameland" with the third floor above the ground of Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan, and Defendant B is the head of the above game site.

No one shall allow anyone to gamble or perform other speculative acts by using game water, or leave him/her to do so.

Nevertheless, from September 28, 2017 to November 1, 2017, the Defendants conspired to set up a "Sash" game machine within the said game room, etc., and provided the cards to unspecified customers who found the head of the game, and caused them to engage in speculative acts using the game water by allowing them to exchange the points recorded on the cards with cash when the points acquired as a result of the game are entered.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. (Fictitious Statement) Any statement made by the prosecutor to the prosecution;

1. Each investigation report (the sequence 2,25, 43, 45 of the evidence list);

1. Photographs (Evidence 3,16,44);

1. Application of the police seizure protocol, list of seizure (Evidence Nos. 9, 10) statute

1. Relevant Article 44 (1) 1 and Article 28 subparagraph 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry (which is a game product owned or occupied by a person) / [the criminal act of this case is “the criminal act of this case requires a person to engage in speculative acts using game water or to prohibit such person to engage in speculative acts by causing a person to engage in money exchange without his/her identity,” so only criminal proceeds acquired as a result of money exchange shall be subject to confiscation, and the criminal proceeds acquired as a result of money exchange shall not be subject to confiscation, and the proceeds acquired while operating the game of this case which is not included in the scope of

There is no evidence to prove that the seized Nos. 3, 4, and 5 is criminal proceeds in connection with money exchange, and 485,321,00 won, for which the Prosecutor seeks additional collection.