폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the ruling shall be made for one year from the date of the final judgment.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The Defendant’s personal information, etc. was not clearly revealed at the time of the offense of mistake of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles.
Since the place of crime was concentrated with entertainment among many unspecified people, it is necessary to arrest Defendant A as an offender in the crime of insult because it is difficult to avoid fear that Defendant A will escape.
Therefore, it is legitimate for police officers at the time to arrest Defendant A as a flagrant offender committing a crime of insult. Thus, the Defendants’ act of assaulting or threatening police officers constitutes obstruction of performance of official duties, and is illegal act deviating from self-defense.
Therefore, the court below found Defendant A not guilty of the violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collective intimidation) and the obstruction of the performance of official duties against the Defendants, there is an error of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles.
B. In light of the various sentencing conditions in the instant case, the lower court’s punishment on Defendant A’s insult (one million won of fine) is too uneasible and unreasonable.
2. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the ex officio judgment prosecutor.
검사는 원심에서 ① 피고인 A에 대한 공소사실 중 “위 H의 다리를 수회 차고”를 “위 H의 다리를 1회 차고”로, “위험한 물건인 맥주병을 손에 쥐고 피해자에게 던질 듯한 태도를 취하여 피해자를 협박하였다”를 “위험한 물건인 맥주병을 손에 들고 ’이 새끼들 다 죽인다‘라고 말하며 때릴 듯한 태도를 취하면서 피해자를 향해 접근하려고 하여 피해자를 협박하였다”로, ② 피고인 B에 대한 공소사실 중 “위 G에게 ’야 이 새끼들아 우리가 뭘 잘못했는데, 씨바 개새끼들아, 친구를 놔 둬라‘고 욕설을 하면서 몸과 손으로 위 G의 가슴을 밀쳐”를"위 G에게 ’이 새끼들아 너가 민중의 경찰이냐, 너네들이 경찰이냐‘라고...