All appeals filed by C and prosecutor are dismissed.

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant did not submit a report to the chief of the competent police station on May 7, 2010, from around 19:23 to 20:00 on May 7, 2010, the Seocho-gu Seoul International Building Transfer (hereinafter “instant site”).

) In the case of the J government, two trustees are set up, and “The J Government shall set up two trustees,” and “The J government shall wear three kickets around the table, i.e., the term “J and the head of the Ho-pon group,” stating that “The head of the Ho-pon group,” “the head of the Ho-pon group, is playing in Korea.” This would promote the security crisis of the J government. There is a serious economic problem in Korea even when the labor workers are going to work in the lease. The J government created several reliefs, and the security crisis was fraudulent to those who pass along the newspapers in the name of the “L issued” under the name of the superintendent of the competent police station without submitting a report in collusion with the chief of the competent police station (hereinafter referred to as the “instant assembly”).

I would like to hold that the program was organized.

B. As to the violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act against Defendant C (hereinafter “the Assembly and Demonstration Act”), the lower court found Defendant C guilty on the ground that the above Defendant’s act constituted holding an outdoor assembly without reporting, and suspended the sentence of a fine of KRW 300,000 to the above Defendant. As to the violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act against Defendant A, B, D, E, and F, the lower court acquitted Defendant C on the ground that it appears that the above Defendants merely participated in the instant assembly, and that it is difficult to view it as holding the instant assembly in collusion with Defendant C.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant C's mistake of facts