손해배상(기)
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 19,051,200 with respect to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from October 7, 2017 to November 2, 2018.
1. The fact that there is no dispute with him/her;
A. On November 30, 2016, the Plaintiff, the major resident of the pianian, and the main owner, entered into a lease agreement with the Defendants on the condition that the lease contract was concluded between the Defendants on the third floor of the fourth floor of the building located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul (hereinafter “instant building section”) located in D, which is owned by the Defendants, 30 million won, monthly rent 1.6 million won, monthly rent 1.6 million won, and from December 1, 2016 to December 24, 2016.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant lease agreement.” The former lessee E of the instant building was equipped with soundproof facilities and minos and operated in the form of providing space to the related owners. However, at the time of the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff paid KRW 15 million to the former lessee E in return for the acquisition of soundproof facilities.
On December 1, 2016, the Plaintiff carried out the interior works with the delivery of the instant building portion from the Defendants. On January 1, 2014, the Plaintiff was carrying in the 1st century and the 3th Ethano in the three practice rooms.
On November 30, 2016, the Plaintiff registered a new business with the trade name “F” as the location of the instant building site where the location of the instant building is the “F,” but closed the existing business on December 7, 2017 and added the “place leasing” to the business details.
B. In the event of water leakage damage, on April 6, 2017, the river basin of the instant building continued to generate water leakage (hereinafter “water leakage in this case”) from the date of water leakage to July 2017, 201, causing damage, such as dyping or falling dyping, fyping, and lowering water to the bottom.
The Plaintiff demanded the Defendants to prepare countermeasures by notifying the Defendants of water leakage, and paid 480,000 won to G, which was originally a construction of soundproof facilities in the instant building, and paid an emergency repair work.
Plaintiff
According to the argument, the argument is examined.