If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

From December 2010 to February 2013, the Defendants: (a) in collusion with C, operated the “E”, a business trip establishment within the scope of 508 of the D Building 508 in Japan east-si; (b) advertised the business through the Internet website or magazines; (c) sent the F and G, etc. to unspecified number of Japanese women who reported and contacted with C, thereby allowing them to have sexual intercourse with customers; and (d) acquired 40% of the amount of sexual traffic in return for the brokerage of sexual traffic, and arranged sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to F, G, and C to each police interrogation protocol;

1. The Defendants: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;