명예훼손등
The appeal is dismissed.
Of the case names of the judgment of the court below, the term "injury" shall be corrected to the term "injury (a known crime name assault)".
The grounds of appeal are examined.
The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant charges on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the “public performance” of the offense of insult, “business” of the crime of interference with business, “Assault” of the crime of assault
Therefore, the appeal shall be dismissed. Since there is an obvious error in the case name indication of the judgment below, it shall be corrected pursuant to Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices