퇴직금
1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
purport, purport, and.
A. The Defendant and E agreed to pay the Defendant fees, etc. for the instant private teaching institute. The Defendant and E agreed to sell the instant private teaching institute.
Accordingly, on December 13, 2012, E entered into a contract for the purchase and sale of a private teaching institute (hereinafter “instant contract”) with H as follows, as a broker of G.
However, at the time of the instant sales contract, the Defendant and E did not attend, and there was no separate discussion on the succession of employment to the workers of the instant private teaching institute between the Defendant and E and H.
A contract of a driving school
1. Seller: H (no more than J) buyer:
2. Sale details: 70 persons, all of the office equipment and facilities of the current Francing Institute, and the original students.
3. Sale amount: An amount equivalent to 1.5 times the total amount of the original tuition fees agreed upon: The remainder of the daily payment ( January 10, 2013): the remainder excluding the down payment and the intermediate payment, out of the total sales amount ( January 17, 2013). < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24380, Jan. 17, 2013>
4. Transfer date: A special agreement on January 10, 2013 * The seller has deferred the payment of the lease deposit for the buyer for one year, and the buyer shall pay to the seller the amount of interest on the first installment per month.
* The balance balance shall be settled after deducting monthly tuition fees from the transfer to the payment of the balance.
C. On January 8, 2013, the Defendant notified the instructors of the instant private teaching institute, including the Plaintiffs, of the transfer of the private teaching institute. On January 10, 2013, the Defendant recommended the Plaintiff to the effect that “If a large number of the students are learning, the students are far away, and the students would be able to work as much as possible.” On the same day, the Defendant recommended the said instructors to the effect that “I would not conform to the terms and conditions of the instructor’s salary.”
H, on January 10, 2013, after acquiring the instant private teaching institute, provides working conditions such as the existing class hours of the instant private teaching institute, the wages for instructors, etc. by January 31, 2013.