A. The Defendants made an offer to U apartment sold by T, but it was not confirmed as the final buyer.

B. T has returned the subscription price in duplicate by mistake while carrying out the business of returning the subscription price to the Defendants whose final number of buyers is not confirmed.

C. Accordingly, T has given the Defendants a peremptory notice to return duplicate subscription money deposited with letters and content certificates on several occasions. D.

However, the Defendants did not refund the amount of the subscription money deposited in duplicate even after the peremptory notice of T.

E. On February 8, 2018, the Plaintiff entered into a contract on the assignment of the duplicate subscription amount to T and the Defendants.

F. The Plaintiff, the assignee of the claim, was delegated by T with the notification of the assignment of claim from the transferor, and notified the Defendants of the fact of the assignment of claim by the certificate with a fixed date, but did not reach the Defendants on the grounds of the addressee'

G. The plaintiff, through the service of a copy of the complaint of this case, notifies the defendants of the fact of the assignment of claims.

H. The Defendants are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff each amount stated in the separate sheet and each amount at the rate of 15% per annum from the date of delivery of a copy of the instant complaint to the date of full payment.

2. As to the remaining Defendants other than Defendant 5, 6, 8, 14, and 16: Judgment deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) by public notice against Defendant 5, 6, 8, 14, and 16: Judgment by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act).