A. The Defendant is a non-speed person performing a house in the name of “E” in the name of “E” in the Gu Government City C Apartment D.

B. In early April 2008, the Defendant stated that “E” means that, around that time, in order to view that the husband was her husband who was seriously ill as a heart soldier and was her husband was able to have the husband’s sick person, the Defendant believed that “the Plaintiff, who was found together with the words, “ her husband was her husband, and she was her husband, or she was her husband.” and that “in order to live her husband due to her husband’s death if her husband did not complete the contract, she must complete the contract.” The Plaintiff believed that the Defendant’s statement that her husband would die without having completed the contract for the transfer of rights due to the imminent circumstances of the Plaintiff was true.

However, in fact, it was thought that the plaintiff would receive the value of the contract value by taking advantage of the poor situation, and even if the defendant had the contract value of the contract value, there was no ability to restore the plaintiff's husband's health or death.

On April 8, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the Plaintiff as above, received KRW 80,00,00 in cash from the Plaintiff under the pretext of the value of the right to receive the payment of the deposit, and by deceiving the Plaintiff on 38 occasions in the same manner as shown in the attached Table, and received or remitted a total of KRW 80,630,00 in cash or in check from the Plaintiff, and had the Plaintiff receive or transfer the total of KRW 174,00,000 from the Plaintiff to the Nonparty F, KRW 9,00,000 in cash, and KRW 11,40,000 in cash or check, and KRW 1,40,000 in Nonparty H, and KRW 276,030,00 in total (hereinafter “the money of this case”).

C. The defendant Na

On November 30, 2016, he/she was prosecuted as a crime of fraud, such as the same crime, and on November 30, 2016, the Speaker's District Court sentenced the Defendant to a conviction of ten months of imprisonment.

(2016 Highest 1875). Although the Defendant appealed, the District Court rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal on May 11, 2017 (2016No3594). The Defendant appealed against this, but the appeal was withdrawn on May 15, 2017.