The Defendant, from February 5, 2017 to February 6, 2017, at the Defendant’s residence, Daegu Dong-gu B, 405 Dong-gu, 202 Dong-gu, and 202 Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, 205 Dong-gu, and 202, sent five calls to the victim C on five occasions, and “I am to the end of this year, whether I am or I am the D apartment, why I am am, why I am am, why I am am, why I am am, and why I am you am. It does not go through two years, LI am, LI am, LI am, I am back of NI am. D apartment.

The term "the victim was threatened" and "the victim was threatened.

Judgment

The instant crime constitutes Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim pursuant to Article 283(3) of the same Act.

However, since the victim expressed his/her intention not to have the defendant punished on March 17, 2017 after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.