공무집행방해등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 30, 2013, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) on the street in front of the D building in Gyeyang-gu, Goyang-gu; (b) the police officer belonging to the Goyang Police Station E-gu, the Goyang Police Station E-gu, who was under the influence of alcohol and was engaged in patrol duty; and (c) the police officer belonging to the Goyang Police Station E-gu, Goyang Police Station E-gu, where he was under the influence of alcohol. However, without complying with the foregoing, the Defendant was indicted, “the head of the rank rank attached to a slope G’s shoulder by flusss, and the head of the house, who took a flusium.” However, there is no other evidence to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant removed the flusium attached to G’s working clothes, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Rather, according to the witness N's legal statement, it seems that the N andO were generated in the process of noting that N andO arrested the defendant as a flagrant offender.
Therefore, this part of the facts charged should be pronounced not guilty on the ground that there is no proof of a crime, but as long as it is found that the facts charged with a single crime are guilty, the judgment of innocence shall not be rendered separately.
On the left side of G, kneee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kn's resistance to arrest the defendant as a flagrant offender, and let the above F-kne-kne-kne-
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and arrest of flagrant offenders.
2. On July 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was arrested on the part of the E District E zone in Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu; (b) was arrested on the part of the Defendant for the same reasons as the preceding paragraph; and (c) was found to be genuine and genuine by the victim police officer working in the workplace; and (d) the Defendant’s wifeJ and the civil petitioners, who are not aware of the name, should be deemed to be “I.”