beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.05.13 2019고정778

개인정보보호법위반

Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. No person who processes or has processed personal information in facts constituting an offense shall divulge personal information learned in the course of performing his/her duties or provide it to another person without authority;

The defendant is a foreigner of the nationality of Indonesia who entered the Republic of Korea as F-6 visa (spouse of a national), and is a person in charge of interpretation work of Indonesia who entered the E-9 visa (non-professionally employed visa) at the Ssung Training Institute affiliated with the KIC located in E-6 visa B in Gyeonggi Indonesia. To guide entry education, foreigners taken internal documents provided by the KIC prior to entry into Korea and sent the list of foreign workers to D who opened the pre-paid heart. The defendant agreed to receive 8,000 won per annum if the entrys open the pre-paid heart from the above D.

Accordingly, around September 13, 2017, the Defendant sent a list of entry holders containing personal information, such as the name, date of birth, nationality, placement business operator name, representative name, place of business address, etc. of Indonesia E (E, passport number: F) that he/she came to know in the course of interpreting Indonesia, to the said D’s program, and disclosed personal information from March 8, 2017 to the said D’s program.

9. Until October 20, it disclosed 363 personal information of Indonesia nationality foreigners, which came to know in the course of performing duties by means of such method as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

2. Determination

A. According to the annexed list of crimes, the following facts revealed that: (a) during the period from March 8, 2017 to September 20, 2017, a foreigner of Indonesia and Eastern’s nationality confirmed the total sum of 2,577 items that he/she opened a separate communications company’s prepaid, and only 363 persons whose identity is confirmed, the defendant was identified as having disclosed his/her personal information to D.