전세금반환
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the facts is that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Determination
A. According to the facts of the judgment on the cause of the claim, since the lease contract of this case was terminated, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 535,347,100, which is the remainder after deducting KRW 464,652,90, which the Plaintiff received from the Plaintiff in the voluntary auction procedure for the building of this case from the deposit money of KRW 1 billion.
B. The defendant's assertion 1) since the defendant's assertion 208.11 to 10, 2013, 60, 778, 123 won of individual electricity charges, 5,90,000 won of public electricity charges (i.e., 100,000 x 59 months), 6,079, 000 of waste charges (i.e., 100,000 x 59 x 59 months) and 2,40,400 of value-added tax (i., 10,000 x 59 x 59 months), 70, 300, 300, 407, 507, 207, 2057, 209, 305, 207, 207, 305, 205, 2006.
According to this, there are no special circumstances.