However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Fraud;

A. On April 14, 2020, the Defendant received an order of alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 207,000 in total from the victim’s entertainment bars in the “C” operated by the victim B, who had no intention or ability to pay the drinking value. In short, the Defendant received an order of alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 207,000 from the victim.

B. At around 10:30 on April 15, 2020, the Defendant revised the indictment to the victim’s name unclaimed boxes, as stated in the indictment to the victim’s name unclaimed boxes, as it is an employee of the above restaurant. In the “Dcafeteria” operated by the Defendant, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the food value, but did not have the intent or ability to pay the food value, the Defendant was ordered to do so by 10,90 won per share for the victim’s total 10,90 won and

C. At around 01:30 on April 18, 2020, the Defendant received an order of alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 240,000, in total from the victim E, even though there was no intent or ability to pay the drinking value in the entertainment drinking house operated by the victim E in the event of strike.

On April 25, 2020, the Defendant received an order to pay the drinking value from the “OOOOO store” operated by the Victim F in the Republic of Korea on April 19, 2020, by ordering the Defendant to pay alcoholic beverages and drinking water, including the Plaintiff’s course of daily works, which are equivalent to KRW 44,500,00, in total.

2. The Defendant attempted to larceny: (a) around April 26, 2020, at the “OO convenience store where the victim G in the city of Pakistan works as an employee”, the Defendant cited the victim’s 1 disease in the amount equivalent to KRW 4,500 of the market price displayed at the convenience store managed by the victim; (b) and (c) was arrested as a flagrant offender and attempted by H during the course of dispatch after receiving the victim’s 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Each written statement of I, G, and E;

1. Investigative reports (to hear statements of victims), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on receipts for damage;

1. Relevant Articles 347(1) and 342 of the Criminal Act, Articles 32 and 329 of the Criminal Act, and choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code to increase concurrent crimes;