If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

From August 4, 2016 to April 3, 2017, the Defendant visited “D”, an Internet gambling site, using a mobile phone at the office located in Seo-gu B, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and then deposited KRW 2970 million in total over 365 times through E bank accounts in the name of the Defendant’s account designated at the above site, such as the list of crimes, and deposited KRW 2970,000,000,000 in total from the above site, and charged the game money corresponding thereto. From August 4, 2016 to April 3, 2017, the Defendant carried out gambling on the “private bridge game” provided at the above site by habitually selecting one of them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Results of execution of a search and seizure warrant;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the period and frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crime was committed up to 365 times or repeated between eight months;

1. Article 246 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 246 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of sentencing of the instant crime on the grounds of the period, amount of gambling, etc., the case may be mitigated, considering the overall circumstances revealed in the records and arguments of the instant case, such as the confession and reflection of the instant crime, and the absence of any criminal record prior to the instant case, etc., a punishment as ordered shall be determined.