When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 3, 2015, at around 14:20, the Defendant: (a) found the victim D (here, 63 years of age) who supported reconstruction in the office of the opposition to reconstruction located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) stated that “a partnership is combined” and “a fright to leave the south’s office,” and assaulted both arms of the victim by her hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Each police protocol of statement about D, E, and G;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and the choice of punishment for the accused and the defense counsel at the time provide that at the time the accused and the victim had enhanced each other’s speech and confidence, and in the process, the victim and the victim left the Defendant, and that there was no scambling of the victim’s arms.

However, the victim and E made a statement that corresponds to the facts charged in this case in a concrete and consistent manner from the investigative agency to the present court, and the F consistently made a statement that the defendant had sold the victim's arms, and the witness G made a statement to the effect that they opposed to the facts charged in this case in this court. However, the investigative agency stated that "The purport of the defendant's statement to the effect that the defendant is back to the purport that he is a return to the defendant, or the witness G "in the investigative agency" in this court, the defendant's statement to the effect that he was stimulated the victim's hand, not that it was a stiking of the victim's hand, but that it was not a stiking of the victim's hand." However, in light of the contents of the police's written statement about G, the purport of the overall question and answer, the method of interpreting the general context, and the circumstances leading up to partial revision of the above statement, etc.

It is reasonable to interpret that the defendant was sleeping the victim's grandchildren.

(b) the amount;