beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.05.09 2013고단1422

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

80,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 12, 2007, the Defendant sentenced the Busan High Court to four years of imprisonment for special robbery, etc., and on May 30, 2008, the Busan District Court sentenced the Defendant to three months of imprisonment for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and on September 30, 2008, the Busan District Court sentenced the Defendant to six months of imprisonment for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on April 12, 2012.

[2013 Highest 1422] The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On February 28, 2013, at around 03:00, the Defendant injected approximately 0.1g of psychotropic drugs in a one-time injection machine (one-time penphone) in the mutual influence room located in Youngdo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and injected them by means of injecting them into the left part of blood.

2. On March 2, 2013, at around 02:00, the Defendant injected approximately 0.1g of psychotropic drugs in a single-use injection machine, in the 5th floor of the Furburine room located in Busan B, the Defendant injected them into a single-use injection machine, dilution with aquatic psychotropic drugs, and then administered them in a way of injection into the Masp bloodline.

[2013 Highest 1840] The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On October 2012, the Defendant injected approximately 0.07 grams of Metepia (so-called philopon) in a single-use injection machine, and dilution it into arms at a new wall border in Busan.

2. On November 2012, the Defendant administered 0.07 gramphones at the location of paragraph 1, in the same manner as that of paragraph 1, at the end of the middle wall border.

3. On November 2012, the Defendant administered a 0.14g gramphones at the lower bottom of the new wall in the same manner as Paragraph 1, at the place referred to in paragraph 1.

4. On December 2012, the Defendant administered 0.14g opphones at the location of paragraph 1, in the same manner as that of paragraph 1, at the end of the middle wall border.

5. On January 2013, the Defendant administered a 0.14g gramphones at the location of paragraph 1, in the same manner as that of paragraph 1, at the beginning of the new wall border.

6. On January 201, 2013, the Defendant is in the same manner as in paragraph 1, at the place under paragraph 1.