A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for three years, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

"2020 Highest 958": A person who obtains money from victims by false means, such as withdrawing money from the account and making it a good example, in order to prove that the Defendants had not been negligent in committing a crime by misrepresenting a financial institution by misrepresenting a large number of unspecified domestic people by telephone, or by misrepresenting himself/herself with an investigative agency, and Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant B promised victims to receive a certain amount of money from the above total book from the beginning of March 2020 to receive a certain amount of money from the victim or other members and then receive money from the victim or other members and then transfer the money to the account where the total amount of money is equal.

1. Defendant A

A. On March 2, 2020, the total liability with which the victim’s name cannot be identified as the fraud against the victim C refers to the victim’s misrepresentation of telephone at a place where the victim could not know at least 5:00 on March 2, 202, and thereby, “a loan may be made at a low interest rate by making up for the performance of the loan and then making the loan back to the existing employees of the financial institution.”

However, the total liability was not an employee of the financial institution, and there was no intention or ability to provide loans at low interest even if the victim received money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the above general liability, as seen above, deceiving the victim, thereby allowing the victim to be provided with cash services of five million won, and the defendant received five million won in cash from the victim at around 18:30 of the same day, around 18:30 of the same day.

B. On March 6, 2020, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim “10 copies of the marine cultural product right, the settlement amount of KRW 495,00, and the victim’s immediate inquiry if he/she is not the principal” at a place where the victim’s identity cannot be known at around 10:14 on March 6, 2020. The defective fact that the victim who reported the text message was “not the purchase fact” and the name of “the victim was stolen.”

e.g.