However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 23, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint intimidation) at the Daejeon District Court on August 25, 2017 and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 25, 2017.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On July 21, 2015, the Defendant opened a mobile phone (D) with respect to the 1st floor LG Plus in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, the Defendant entered “E”, “Seoul Seo-gu,” “E”, “E”, and “E” in the column for date of birth on the application form for the subscription of LG Plus by using a testing tool on the application form for the subscription form, and signed on the name side of the application form.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights, the Defendant forged an application for joining mobile phones in the name of E, which is a private document on the duty of appraisal without authority.

B. On August 2015, the Defendant opened a mobile phone (H) at around 1-A, and entered “E”, “E”, “S”, “S”, and “E” in the column for date of birth in the form for application for LG Plus subscription using a verification color pen on the site for application for membership of LG Plus, and entered “E” in the column for entry into the State column, and entered “E” in the bottom of the application form at the bottom of the application form, and signed “E” next to the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights, the Defendant forged an application for joining mobile phones in the name of E, which is a private document on the duty of appraisal without authority.

2. Exercising the relevant investigation document;

A. At the time, at the time, at the place specified in Paragraph 1-A, the Defendant: (a) exercised to the person in charge of the opening of LG Plus who is unable to know his/her name of forgery; (b) by transmitting a forged mobile phone entry application by facsimile as described in Paragraph 1-A; and (c) as if the completion of the application was genuine.

B. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1-b. The Defendant, as described in paragraph 1-B, has completed a forged mobile phone entry application as if it were genuine.