However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 10, 2020, the injured Defendant: (a) considered that the victim was her false statement in the public parking lot for Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, 13-1 located in 13-1, and (b) considered that the victim was her false statement; (c) opened the victim's cell phone on the left side of the victim and opened it over the floor by making it possible for the victim to her false statement; and (d) opened the side blick part of the victim's side blick on the left side of the victim; and (e) opened the part

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the cutting off of the floor and the upper end of the floor in need of approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

2. On August 10, 2020, the Defendant damaged the property by putting one cell phone of the amounting to KRW 1,100,000 on the floor of the market price owned by the Plaintiff and 732,90,00 of the repair cost on the floor, considering that the damage was caused while the Defendant was coming to the victim B’s cell phone in the public parking lot located in Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, 13-1.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

3. On August 10, 2020, at the entrance of the D Emergency Hospital at Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 to the effect that “the male will leave the D Emergency Hospital; (b) sent the E District F, etc. to the D Emergency Center; (c) the Defendant entered the said Emergency Center to interview the victim; and (d) the said slope F, in order to stop the Defendant into the said Emergency Center in order to protect the victim; (c) the Defendant attempted to have the Defendant go back to the surrounding road on one occasion on one occasion on the left side of the said F Line; and (d) tried to go to go to the surrounding road for the purpose of undermining the Defendant’s self-harm; and (e) tried to remove the slope G and the said slope F from it, and carried out drinking to the said police officers.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement F, B of each police statement, on-site photographs, and written estimates;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;