beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.01.05 2017고단4463

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 08:30, at the Government-si, sent the body of the victim D(28 years of age) emitted from the elevator from thero room 1 floor to drinking, and (b) caused the victim’s body on a several occasions, the victim’s body was examined as a part of the number of days of treatment to the victim.

2. Damage to property;

A. On July 29, 2017, around 08:40 on July 29, 2017, the Defendant destroyed KRW 30,000 of the repair cost, following the Defendant’s appearance of the “F” dispute with the G in front of the “F” store. However, the Defendant destroyed the Defendant’s appearance of approximately KRW 30,000 of the repair cost by going through the Defendant’s outdoor sowing bridge for the use of the victim H.

B. At around 08:45 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) carried out a 'J convenience store located I’ before the opening of the 'J convenience store,’ and destroyed KRW 30,000 of the repair cost by placing a fixed bridge for the table for outdoor use of the victim K, and continuously parked part of the bit of the victim K-owned L-going vehicle that was parked one time as a drinking, thereby damaging KRW 300,000 of the repair cost.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 09:00 on the same day, assaulted the N assistant belonging to the Ma Police box, who was dispatched after receiving a report on the front of the "F in Ma, E" on the same day, in a way that helps the said police officer tightly and tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly, and boomed by N slope, which led to the control of her behavior, with the left hand part of the chest.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in charge of handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to N or D;

1. Each statement of K, H andO;

1. Each investigation report (in relation to on-site conditions, statements of victims, etc., and the victim's statement or business establishment that the victim deemed that the police officer was sealed, the victim's statement or business establishment "F"

The visual video reading of the Si Tti Brith, the confirmation of goods damaged by property damage, and the visual films for each crime prevention.