On November 8, 2010, no one may engage in brokerage services using another person's name or trade name. On the part of the above office, the Defendant arranged the conclusion of a lease contract with the content that he/she leases KRW 600,000,000 to the E 102 Dong 203 (hereinafter "the instant officetel") located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, by receiving KRW 102,000,000,000 from G upon request of G, which was found as a customer to rent an officetel using the name of licensed real estate agent F.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's name to render brokerage services.

Judgment

1. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence adopted and examined by the court.

The Defendant and I, each of their brokerage assistants, worked at the E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Suwon-si D from October 30, 2009. The inter-party licensed real estate agents were changed in order of J, K, and F, and at the time of November 8, 2010, F was licensed real estate agents.

At the time of November 8, 2010, the legal relationship of the instant officetel was as follows.

- The owner entered into a sales contract with H on October 11, 2010 - senior collateral security (the maximum amount of claims KRW 122,2200,000) - The “E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” was delegated by L around October 28, 2010, and H as to the lease of the instant officetel from November 1, 2010 to November 1, 201, respectively.

The Defendant and I, at the above “E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” on November 8, 2010, introduce the instant officetel to G and his mother, who were found to be a customer for the rent of officetels, and to M and I, respectively. Of the absence of licensed real estate agents F, determine the lease deposit amount as KRW 90 million on behalf of H, and the remainder payment date as of November 20, 201, respectively.