However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 06:30 on June 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 06:30, the Defendant: (b) placed a fluor and vinyl, etc. accumulated in front of the entrance and exit of the entrance and exit of the victim in the dwelling of the victim E, his/her his/her his/her father, who was his/her father, was heeped with the Defendant and the Defendant, on the ground that he/she was heeped with the Defendant and avoided the Defendant; (c) placed the fluor and vinyl, etc. he/she was fluored in front of the entrance and exit of the fluor; (d) however, (e) placed a fluor in front of the entrance and exit of the fluor; and (e) placed the victim under a fluor and the victim did not commit any attempt by extinguishing the fire and fire.

On May 26, 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven the G Welfare Center located at the top of the third head of the G Welfare Center located in the Y-si, Y-si, Macheon-gu, Macheon-gu, Seoul, by driving a vehicle with approximately KRW 4,000,000, the victim H owned by the Defendant, who was parked at the top of the third head of the G Welfare Center; (b) KRW 646C Mababa, a road of KRW 646C.

Summary of Evidence

"2013 Gohap216"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. On-site photographs and investigation reports (CCTV analysis) "2013 Gohap230";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. He/she written statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the detection of stolen vehicles, a report on seizure, and a seizure list;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 174, 164 (1) of the Criminal Act that apply to criminal facts, the choice of punishment (the points of attempted fire-prevention, the choice of limited imprisonment), and Article 329 of the Criminal Act;

1. From among concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishment of the principal building, structure with heavy penalty, and attempted crime of arson) shall be concurrent crimes;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for one year;