However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of K5 si.

On February 24, 2017, 15:30 around 15:30, the Defendant proceeded three lanes in front of the horizontal four-lane in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, with three-lanes from the boundary of the stop at the north-gu, at a distance of about 60km per hour.

Since there is a place where signal lights and crosswalks are installed, the driver has a duty of care to live well in the front and right and the right and the right of the driver and to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was driven by the victim C(63 Does) driving on the left side from the right side of the Defendant’s running direction of the crosswalk pedestrian signals to the left side, due to his negligence in contravention of the signal.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as double-water 1, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence, such as a bee finite, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs and diagnostic certificates;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the same Act on the grounds that there is some negligence on the part of the victim, such as the fact that the defendant is serious in the degree of injury suffered by the victim, the fact that the defendant