A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, for four months, for six months, for six months, and for one year, for defendant C, respectively.

[criminal record] On October 29, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on August 29, 2015 by imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement at the Busan District Court Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 14, 2015.

Defendant

D On June 19, 2015, a person who was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in August, 2015 due to a violation of road traffic law (drinking) at the Suwon Flag method Board, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years, and the above judgment was finalized on June 27, 2015.

[2] Defendant A and Defendant B are co-representatives of “G” (former H) that sell and manufacture plastics, and Defendant D served as a technician in the above “G” from July 2014. Defendant C had been aware of working in the same industry as Defendant D from around July 2009, and there was a money transaction from around 10 years prior to the victim I and the victim I.

Defendant

D with knowledge that the financial situation of G, in which he/she works, is very rough difficult, he/she received an electronic bill of KRW 200 million (the issuance of the “J” and the due date of maturity April 29, 2015) from an unqualified person inside Gyeonggi-do, with the knowledge that he/she is a very rough difficult situation, with a view to dividing the money in the face value of discount using the said bill into the face value of discount. Defendant C is in the face of the face value of the bill discount, Defendant C is in the face of the face value of the bill discount, Defendant B provides the “G (A) bank account in the face of the bill discount account,” Defendant B, the representative of “G”, with the intent to act as the payer of the bill, etc.

Accordingly, Defendant C falsely stated that, at the office of “L” operated by Defendant C at Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, that “The company issuing fish is an eco-friendly food supply company, and there is no risk that the company would be easily aware of the school meals in Gyeonggi-do, and that it will normally settle the payment on the due date of the bill at the discount of the bill.”

However, in fact, the Defendants acquired the said bill through normal transaction relations.