대여금
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 50,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from February 1, 2018 to the date of full payment.
According to the purport of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff may be recognized as having lent KRW 50 million to the Defendant on September 2, 2015, KRW 10 million on September 3, 2015, KRW 50 million on September 5, 2015, KRW 500,000 on September 5, 2015, KRW 500,500 on November 28, 2015, KRW 10,000 on November 30, 2015, and KRW 50,000,000 on December 1, 2015, and KRW 50,000 on December 1, 2015, the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 50,00,000 on the instant complaint from February 1, 208 to the day of full payment.
As to this, the defendant asserts that C has no obligation to repay the above money because C has decided to repay the defendant's debt to the plaintiff on behalf of the plaintiff, but there is no evidence to deem C has been discharged from the defendant's obligation, and even if C has discharged the defendant's obligation on the part of the contract with the defendant, the assumption of obligation takes effect with the consent of the obligee even if C has discharged the defendant's obligation on the part of the contract with the defendant, and there is no evidence
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.