A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act in the Incheon District Court’s Branch on November 28, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around December 6, 2014.

[Criminal facts] The defendants are married couple, and they are the same as D, the actual operator of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and the defendant B is the lender in the name of the Eul, and the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd operates F and G along with E.

1. On July 2014, the Defendants’ joint crime committed the crime committed with the intent to refrain from withdrawing the sales amount by changing the password of the sales account of the said film board, upon the occurrence of a dispute with D with the E with the right to operate the E located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government H.

Accordingly, around August 2014, Defendant A instructed Defendant B to change the password of the deposit account managing the EM, and Defendant B, around August 24, 2014, prevented the victim from withdrawing the sale of the film museum by changing the password of five (Account Number L, M, N,O, P) and six (Account Number L, E, U,V, and W) of the K Bank’s deposit account in his name, which was transferred and managed by the transfer of the E at the new branch of the J Bank located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, from August 24, 2014.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the operation of the film center of the victim by deceptive means.

2. Defendant A

A. On August 4, 2014, the Defendant entered “victimY” in the facts charged of this part of the Y, a film board employee, in the F Office located in X, but according to the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this court, “Y” can be acknowledged as a film board employee, who is not the victim of the fraud, and even if corrected, it does not affect the Defendant’s exercise of the right of defense. Thus, “Y” is ex officio corrected “Y” as “Y”, and thus, it is deemed that the correction does not affect the Defendant’s exercise of the right of defense.

The sentence is to prohibit cash sales from among the sales of film board tickets.