폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and forty hours of order to attend a course) is too unreasonable.
2. The crime of this case in which the judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the crime of this case was committed by threatening the victim and destroying the glass of the wall; (b) the quality of the crime is inferior; and (c) the defendant reflects his fault; and (d) the agreement with the victim is deemed to reflect the favorable circumstances for the defendant or the sentencing sufficiently, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances to be newly considered in the sentencing after the decision of the court below, and there is no discovery of changes in circumstances that are to be newly considered in the sentencing after the decision of the court below; and (d) considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant'
3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.