2. There is no dispute over the fact that a notary public has prepared a notarial deed of promissory notes in the amount of 200 million won, No. 643, 2013 against the defendant.

However, according to Gap's 1 and 6, it is recognized that the plaintiff deposited the principal and interest of 204,683,800 won and the execution cost of 661,213 won under the law No. 1359 of 2017 as the gold 6158 of this Court.

Therefore, the defendant's notary public against the plaintiff is not allowed to enforce compulsory execution based on the notarial deed of a promissory note No. 643 of 2013. It is so decided as per Disposition.