When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 01:40 on October 19, 2018, the Defendant: “C operated by the Defendant located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul.” On the ground that, prior to the restaurant, D provided feed to the Defendant, and caused a mutual dispute with one another on the grounds that it interfered with the Defendant’s restaurant business, the circumstance F of the Seoul Central Police Station E zone located in the Seoul Central Police Station E zone, which received 112 reports and called “the reporter should not fright or throw away to another place,” and “the police should not fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright,” and fright to fright to fright his chest by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the defendant;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of CCTV video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below on the grounds of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (limited to a suspended sentence of a fine in consideration of the fact that the degree of violence is insignificant);