However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 23, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported on October 23, 2016, 02:38, around the 1112-gu Seogu, Daegu-gu, that the Defendant was dissatisfied with the 'C' restaurant B; (b) the police officers affiliated with the police station D District Unit of the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, who received a request for returning home from the police officers E who were called to have been called her for returning home from the 'C' restaurant; and (c) the Defendant, in drinking, interfered with a police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the report of 112 cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution of public duties (including the fact that there is no record of punishment for obstructing the performance of public duties, the degree of violence, etc.);