The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a Class C cargo vehicle.

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on December 18:05, and proceeded along the road of three lanes in front of the six-lane apartment of Burging from his private distance to his private park, at the speed of about 91km from his private distance.

At the time, the speed of restriction is 60km per hour, and at the front of the road, there was a crosswalk, so there was a duty of care to check whether there was a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle to reduce the speed and to see the road well, and to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded with a speed exceeding 31 km per hour, and caused the victims to go beyond the ground by going through the victim D (16 tax) and the victim E (16 tax) who cross the crosswalk from the left side to the right side.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence caused the death of the said victim D from cerebral cerebral cerebral injury at the Switzerland Hospital, the Hansi-ro, the Hansi-ro, the Hansi-ro, one of which was under the treatment of the said victim D after around 18:59 on the same day. On March 11, 2017, the said victim E caused the death of the said victim E with a multiple long-term salption at the same hospital where the treatment was under the treatment of the transmission after around 20:30.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each death diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 3 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The sentence is imposed as ordered in consideration of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive of the crime, and circumstances after the crime; and (b) the sentencing conditions indicated in the records.