구상금
1. To the extent of the property inherited from the network D, the Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A shall be subject to KRW 9,435,719 and KRW 2,803,09 among them.
1. Determination as to the plaintiff's claim, the facts as stated in the reasons for the claim, and the facts that D deceased on April 13, 2008 and succeeded to by Defendant A, Defendant B, and C, who are their children, can be recognized by the respective statements in the evidence as to Gap's inheritance. Accordingly, according to their respective inheritance shares, the defendant A, according to each inheritance share, has the obligation to pay to the plaintiff 9,435,719 won (the principal and interest on loans x 3/7 x 3/7), and 2,803,094 won (the balance of the principal of the loan x 6,540,540 x 3/7) among them (the balance of the principal of the loan x 3/7 6,290,479 won x 22,678 x 2/70) and 1,868,719 won (the amount of delay damages x 205.29% x 105.294 x 205.7.1.294 x 5.205.20.1.25).20
2. The Defendants asserted that the Defendants were subject to a qualified acceptance judgment, and thus, the facts that the Defendants received an adjudication on the limited acceptance of inheritance under the Seoul Family Court Decision 2015Ra215 on March 25, 2015 are significant facts in this court. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim is reasonable within the scope of the property inherited from the network D. Thus, this part of the Defendants’ defense is with merit.
3. Accordingly, the defendants are obligated to pay the amount of money in determining the plaintiff's claim within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, so it is so decided as per Disposition.