However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 23:20 on February 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) performed drinking with the victim E (years 32) and five other than the victim F (years 32) and talked about the company’s business at the D main points located in the window C of Changwon-si; (b) the victim E pointed out the Defendant’s business attitude; (c) the Defendant was able to flick down flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat flat fat fl.

As a result, the defendant suffered double scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics, etc. for two weeks to the victim E

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of standing photographs);

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Consideration under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (a favorable consideration, such as the fact that it is against the recognition of a mistake in self-reliance, that it is agreed with the victim F, that it deposited KRW 2 million for the victim E, that it has no penalty power exceeding twice a fine, and that it has no penalty power exceeding twice);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly considering the same conditions as the above);

1. Social service order under the Criminal Act;