The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Defendant

A and Defendant B are residing in the Seogu Seo-gu Seoul apartment D, and they are married couple, and the victim E is the same apartment resident.

On December 21, 2017, at around 18:25, the Defendants received a demand from the injured party for the delivery of the dispute as a result of the custody of the strike in front of the Seo-gu Seo-gu C Apartment D, Seo-gu, Daegu, and caused a mutual dispute. Defendant A, “I”, “Is the bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit,” and Defendant B also insulting the injured party as “A, kh kh k kb kb kb,” and Defendant B’s “A, kh kh kb

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B concerning the police officer

1. Statement by the police about E;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a record of investigation reports (the submission of a recording file in conversations with the criminal suspect at the time of the complainant), recorded files CDs, and conversation records;

1. Relevant Articles 311 and 30 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Articles 311 and 310 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants in the custody of a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act