If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 00:40 on January 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) when the Defendant was at the end-to-door store for the victim C’s operation in Asan City, on the ground that there was a fluencing portion upon the request for non-smoking from D, his employees; (b) when the Defendant fluencing part of the television flucing part of the market price, by cutting off the table table in the waiting room into the 17th floor a total of 8,40,000 won of the market price at the right angle, and by cutting off the 17th floor of the 840,000 won of the market price at the right angle, the Defendant laid down the flucing part of the television 50,000 won of the market price on the wall.

As a result, the defendant damaged the table, cover, a flaps, and television owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for C, D, and E;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Consideration, such as the fact that there exists a same record of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the fact that a person repeats the crime during the period of suspension of execution, the fact that the person committed the crime at the time and commits the crime against the wrong fact, and