1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. A. Around October 8, 2009, the Defendant, on the charge of the crime, told the victim of the phone at an infinite place on October 8, 2009, that “I would promptly repay the victim within the number of days if I want to lend the hospital expenses, and the hospital expenses are urgently needed.”

However, in fact, the Defendant intended to use the said money as room-based care operating expenses and living expenses of his wife, rather than the hospital expenses of his wife. Since the Defendant borrowed money to many people without any particular property at the time, there was no intention or ability to repay the said money even if she borrowed the said money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 10 million won from the victim to the post office account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

B. On March 19, 2010, the Defendant concluded that, around March 19, 2010, the Defendant would pay off the victim a false statement to the effect that, “Around March 19, 2010, the Defendant would have to obtain an officetel around the Gu road” from the front of the Gu road in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government damaged Seoul Metropolitan Government.

However, in fact, the Defendant borrowed money to many people without any particular property at the time, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received KRW 10 million from the victim to the post office account in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and obtained KRW 10 million as a check on the 22th of the same month, and acquired KRW 20 million in total.

C. Around July 2010, the Defendant concluded that the Defendant would pay KRW 25 million to the victim of the “F” in the “F” specialty store in front of the Scream distance of the E High School located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul Metropolitan Government G Apartment 325 Dong 302) as the construction cost on the ground that the Defendant would do so.

However, the defendant does not have any particular property at the time.