사기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the court below (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of the execution of two years, the probation, and the community service order 160 hours) is too unreasonable in light of the overall sentencing conditions in light of the summary of the grounds for appeal.
2. Determination of the grounds for appeal of this case is recognized that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and repented in depth, and there is no previous conviction in addition to the punishment sentenced twice due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc., and the part of the land sold by the defendant to the victim was owned by the defendant.
However, the crime of this case is not suitable for the crime of this case because the defendant knew that only 172 square meters of CJ 496 square meters (hereinafter "the site of this case") are owned by the defendant, and that 324 square meters of 324 square meters of 324 square meters of 324 square meters of 40 square meters of 300 square meters of 300 square meters of 496 square meters of 100 square meters of 300 square meters of 400 square meters of 300 square meters of 40,000 in the name of the defendant, completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the defendant, as the whole of the site of this case, deceiving the victim as if the land of this case was owned by the defendant, and received the payment of 65 million won of 65 million won of 60,000 won from the victim as the purchase price from the owner of the register of the land of this case, and the victim did not take any measures to recover damage until the trial.
3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.