beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.07.08 2019고단2442

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant

H Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, for eight months, for Defendant I, and for ten months, for Defendant A.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

H is a person operating the "K Gameland" in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, and Defendant A is a game machine dealer, and Defendant I is a game machine installer.

No one shall provide game products for the distribution or use, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Rating Board, or display or store such products for such purposes.

Defendant

A around June 18, 2018, in the vicinity of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, sold 50 game machine 50,000,000 won, Defendant H sold 13,000,000 won of “space War 2” game machine, and Defendant I had Defendant I install (one-day “Scaming”), and around June 21, 2018, received KRW 5,00,00 as the down payment, and transported 50,000 won of the “space War 2” game machine operated by Defendant H to the said K Gameland operated by Defendant H.

Defendant

Defendant I, upon contact with Defendant H around June 21, 2018, who was subject to the prior communication from the above K Gameland, to the effect that the game machine was arrived at around the above K Gameland, was automatically carried out without any operation of Leber, and if a specific image appears in accordance with the probability that the game was carried out automatically without any operation of Leber, it shall be installed in a modified state to discharge multiple items card units, and the remaining 15th unit of the "space 2" game machine was automatically carried out without any operation of Leber, and if a specific image appears, it was installed in a altered state to discharge an item card, and in return, it was issued KRW 1 million.

Defendant

H installed 50 game instruments modified from June 22, 2018 to July 3, 2018, and operated K Gameland.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game products with contents different from the contents of the rating classification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant I’s legal statement

1. Defendant H and A’s respective legal statements 1.