도로법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On October 19, 195, around 19:37, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by the road management authority by loading and operating the freight exceeding the limited storage weight of D freight vehicles with respect to the Defendant’s business, in front of the control room for the 34 lines of national highways located in the Dog-ri, Dog-ri, the Dog-ri, the Dog-ri, the Dog-si.
2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged in the instant case, was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court on Oct. 28, 2010, and accordingly, the said provision of the Act retroactively lost its effect.
Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment against the defendant is publicly announced under Article 58(2)