2. According to the records, although the total amount of damage is not 14,400,000 won, the method of deception is not sufficient to be active, the defendant's criminal records are four times prior to the crime of fraud, and the sentence is imposed three times, and the crime in this case is committed during the period of repeated crime, the victim's damage has not been recovered up to now, and it seems that the victim has not made any effort to recover damage, and the sentencing of the court below is appropriate in full view of the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, and circumstances leading to the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.