Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment by rendering a not guilty verdict of the facts charged in this case.

2. The court below held that the direct evidence supporting the facts charged of this case lies in E's investigation agency and the court below's statement, but it corresponds to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the defendant first arrived at D on the day of the case and did not calculate the connection value with the defendant with the beer, but the defendant did not find any reason or motive for committing an indecent act in Gap's chest, ② the defendant entered the room No. D9, ② the defendant-friendly job offer F entered the room, and the defendant stated that the defendant was not deemed to have delivered Eul's chest, and therefore, the defendant did not commit an indecent act in Eul within nine studio, ③ the defendant at the time.