If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

피고인은 2017. 4. 1. 경부터 2017. 4. 13. 경까지 화성시 B 오피스텔 310호에서 성매매 여성인 C 등 3명을 성매매 종업원으로 고용하고, 인터넷 사이트인 ‘D’, ‘E ’에 접속하여 “ 위치: 동 탄 F, 영업시간: 오후 12시 - 새벽 4시, 60분( 원 샷) 13만 원, 120분( 투 샷) 26만 원” 이라는 내용의 광고 글을 올려 이를 보고 찾아온 불특정 다수의 성매매 남성들 로부터 위 금액을 받고 성관계를 하도록 하여 영업으로 성매매를 알선하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in the preparation of a letter of apology against G;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of the statutes governing the lease contract for photographs or officetels;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The act of arranging sexual traffic is not good for a criminal act that may impair the sound sexual culture and good customs by commercializing the sex of a sexual traffic. The favorable circumstances - the defendant recognizes all the criminal facts. - The defendant is an initial criminal without any history of punishment - the type of crime, such as the frequency and degree of sexual traffic intermediarys, should be taken into account. In light of all the sentencing conditions revealed in the trial process in each of the above circumstances, the sentence should be imposed as ordered in consideration of the overall sentencing conditions revealed in the trial process