When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 30, 2017, the Defendant, at a children's play place in the E-Sadong 683, was under the influence of alcohol, and was under the influence of alcohol to provide tourists with a bath while under the influence of alcohol.

On the ground that the police officer D, who was called upon the report, solicited the Defendant to return to her home and petition, 20 tourist guards were openly insulting “a police officer,” “a police officer,” and “a police officer,” and “a police officer,” who was called farbly insultingly insulting the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the Provisional Payment Order (the defense counsel of the defendant, and the defendant was in a mental and physical state at the time of committing the instant crime due to intellectual disorder;

The argument is asserted.

In light of various circumstances, such as the process and method of the instant crime, the means and method, and the Defendant’s speech and behavior before and after the instant crime, the Defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of the instant crime.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, this part of the defense counsel's assertion is rejected.

The reason for sentencing was that the Defendant had a mental and physical weak condition at the time of committing the instant crime.

(1) In light of the circumstances, such as the fact that there seems to exist any intellectual obstacles in the latitude and longitude;