폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.
In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
At around 23:30 on May 20, 2016, the Defendants followed the victim FF and the victim F, the victim G (the victim 23 years old), the victim H (the victim 20 years old), and the victim H (the victim H (the victim H 19 years old) on the ground that the Defendants continued to put the victim F and the victim I.
On the following day, at around 00:30, Defendant A 1 got her fat from the victim F to her fat, and Defendant B her her hand her her her her her her her her her her, and the victim G her her her her her her her her her her her her her face was her her hand.
Then, at the front of the K convenience point located in the same GuJ near the foregoing drinking house around that time, Defendant A, by hand, carried the victim F's f head, Defendant B was at the time of drinking, and Defendant B was at the time of the head of the F. Then Defendant A was pushed up with F.
In addition, in the process, Defendant B prices the face and reputation of Victim H who tells himself with a elbow.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted three victims.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;
1. Each police statement of G and H;
1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing F, G, and H;
1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. and Punishment of Specific Crimes, Article 2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reasoning for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shows that the Defendants shown the reasons for sentencing by the investigative agency or the first trial date, the Defendants did not have any record of criminal punishment, but can have a record of juvenile protection, the instant crime is bad in light of its circumstances, attitudes and results, and one of the victims is the Defendant who is the aged female.