When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On June 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 01:50 on June 3, 2015, the Defendant: (b) performed drinking in the presence of other customers under the influence of alcohol at “E stores” operated by the victim D with the second floor of Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Incheon, and the first floor; (c) performed drinking without permission; and (d) the Defendant was able to control the victim, and (c) the Defendant was a customer when he/she sold to both owners, and is not a customer when he/she performed drinking and drinking.

Around 20 minutes of disturbance, such as “I amben” and “I amben, I amben” and “I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben, so I am unable to respond the victim to the customers who had been in his place.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

2. At the above time and place, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as: (a) whether the victim did not drink but did so; and (b) whether the victim booms himself/herself at his/her shop; and (c) whether the victim booms his/her hair and booms his/her hair.

3. On June 3, 2015, the Defendant, in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, was arrested in the act of interference with business affairs around 03:00, and sent to the same district unit in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong Police Station located in 50, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Seoul. Then, the Defendant expressed his desire to “I am shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shots” at the place. “I do not go to the suspension of the execution period unless I do so.”

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to a very rough speech and behavior in a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A report on dispatch to the scene of violence, a suspect D's photograph, and a CCTV CD in the same rock district (the defendant was in the condition that his/her business was terminated because he/she did not have any other customer on the victim's head office, and thus, the defendant

However, the term "business" in the crime of interference with business means the business.